Read and reconcile a payout
Payouts is the first item in your sidebar and where Lokom drops you after login. The page is headed Payout Summary, and its job is stated at the top: "Reconcile a closed period before the payroll hand-off."
Payouts is read-only. Validating, rejecting and re-running statements happen in Review & Close. Come here to understand a number and hand it to payroll; go there to change it. → Review and close
Goal
Answer, for any period: what are we paying in total, who is it going to, and can I explain any single line of it.
Prerequisites: a period that has been computed. Closed periods are the point of the page; an open one still shows figures, but they move.
Start at the org level
- Click Payouts.
- Pick the period from the Period dropdown.
What you get before selecting anything:
- Payout (payable) — the headline total, with
N statements · N payablebeneath it. - A table of Team / Share of payout / Statements / Payable, plus an Org total row.
The page says what this view is for: "Nothing selected yet, so the detail pane holds the org-level read: where the spend sits, and where the reconciliation is incomplete."
Read the share column first. One team at 90% of spend is either your commercial reality or a plan mistake, and you want to know which before payroll runs.
Drill into a role
The left pane, Roles by team, lists All teams and then each team with its roles, member counts and amounts. Click a role — or use ↑ ↓ to move and → to jump into the people list.
The detail pane then shows four checks worth reading in order:
| Chip | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Completeness | Whether everyone expected actually has a statement. "No expected roster" means Lokom has nothing to compare against |
| Δ vs prior | How this role's spend moved against last period. "Structure changed" means the roster itself moved, so the comparison is not like-for-like |
| Status | How many statements are validated |
| Attainment | A link straight to Quotas → Attainment for the same period |
Below them, every person in the role with their payout and a Detail link.
Δ vs prior is the highest-value number on this page. A role whose spend doubled without a matching change in production is the single cheapest bug to catch before payday.
Explain one person's number
Click Detail on anyone. The person page is built to answer "why was I paid this?" from the top down.
1. The header — their team › role, the period, and two chips: whether the period is Closed and whether the statement is Validated. Then the payout total.
2. "How this payout was built" — the arithmetic as a single line:
R-Split €22,624 + R-Flat €7,500 + R-FlatMult €15,000 + Rule 1 €60,600
= Payout €105,724 (as exported to payroll)
One term per rule. If a rep expected a bonus and there is no term for it, the rule did not fire — that is your answer, and you never needed to open the plan.
3. "Breakdown by rule" — each rule expanded to the deals behind it, with a subtotal per rule and an amount per deal. Every deal name links straight to Pipedrive, so "which deal is that" is one click, not a search.
4. Footer: Computed commission — the sum, which should match the header.
5. Sidebar — Attainment vs quota and Plan in this period, the latter linking to the exact plan that produced the number. Use that link rather than the current plan: they can differ. → Plan lifecycle and versions
6. Prior periods — the same person's earlier closed statements, for a trend rather than a snapshot.
Hand it to payroll
Export for payroll sits at the top right of the summary. Export from a closed period. → Export to payroll
Common mistakes
- Reconciling an open period. The figures move as deals land. Reconcile after close.
- Reading the current plan instead of the one that paid. Use the Plan in this period link on the person page.
- Trusting a total without Completeness. A role can look right and still be missing a person who never got a statement.
- Trying to fix something here. Nothing on this page is editable — that is deliberate. Corrections go through Review & Close, then recompute.
When the numbers look wrong
- The whole team is zero → check the plan is
activeand a period is open. → A rep sees no commission - One person is missing → check Completeness, then their role and plan.
- A number is right but the rep disagrees → walk the breakdown with them, deal by deal. → Payout lineage
Related
- Review and close — where you change things
- Export to payroll
- Look up one person